Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:13:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Jorge Luis Gonzalez <list+freebsd@jorge.cc> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backup tools Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206231512210.38324@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120623125739.GA82828@jorge.cc> References: <20120622160903.GE24912@hemlock.hydra> <20120622184740.GA67847@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20120623003717.GD7876@hemlock.hydra> <20120623075928.GA19093@slackbox.erewhon.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206231007190.31324@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120623125739.GA82828@jorge.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
what exactly deficiences and requirements not met by rsync are you talking about? > simplifications of rsync's ability to exclude files or directories, elegant > handling of backups' expirations) are sufficient to make it a worthy > alternative to naked rsync. The frontend is written in Perl and easily > extended. > > By "heterogeneous networks" I'm afraid I mean ones composed of machines running > unix-like OSs; I've no idea if there's an rsync port to Windows. there are many. I know people using it ... after they know how useful it is based on my examples. No idea how stable and usable they are.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206231512210.38324>