From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 14 11:00:41 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C2B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:00:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E33943D1F
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:00:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3EB0fon050441
	for <freebsd-doc@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:00:41 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3EB0fwT050440;
	Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:00:41 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:00:41 GMT
Message-Id: <200504141100.j3EB0fwT050440@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: docs/79901: Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a
	followup in the problem-reports article.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:00:41 -0000

The following reply was made to PR docs/79901; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
To: Julien Gabel <jpeg@thilelli.net>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/79901: Incoherence of the recipient to whom to send a followup in the problem-reports article.
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:54:29 +0300

 On 2005-04-14 12:12, Julien Gabel <jpeg@thilelli.net> wrote: The
 > FreeBSD article 'problem-reports' says that there exists two methods to
 > submit a followup: either use the followup link on the individual PR's web
 > page, or just mail it to <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org>.  I think the
 > incoherence come from the fact that the @email found on the individual PR's
 > web page actually is <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org> which is different
 > than <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org>.
 
 The bug-followup address is an alias for freebsd-gnats-submit.  It doesn't
 really matter which one you use.
 
 > Compare the information found at:
 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/pr-followup.html
 > and the link provided at the foot of the page at, for example:
 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/58154
 
 > Because i don't which email recipient is the good one (better one?), i don't
 > know which of the two parts must be adjusted: the bottom part of individual
 > PRs, or the problem-reports article.
 
 I prefer the first one, since bug-followup@ is more friendly to us human
 earthlings than some obscure gnats-dependent alias.  The bug-followup address
 is easier to remember, because it matches the functionality of the alias
 (followup/reply to a bug report).