Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:06:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Harding <mvh@ix.netcom.com> To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please TEST changes to files!!!! panel-- doesn't work Message-ID: <20020716160653.615C013109@netcom1.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <3D343F30.7D134348@FreeBSD.org> (message from Maxim Sobolev on Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:43:44 %2B0300) References: <20020716142840.9E2E013109@netcom1.netcom.com> <3D343F30.7D134348@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeah, but I am losing hair! Is there some way that gnome changes can be quarantined until tested, or something? A simple 'make' before a commit would be good, even... ;) - Mike H. Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:43:44 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Organization: Vega International Capital X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=PLING_PLING,PLING,ROUND_THE_WORLD,AWL version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: * OOPS, I am really sorry. I did not notice that these files are actually auto-generated ones, so that their real sources have to be patched instead. Mea culpa and I will try to be more careful in the future. Thank you for reporting - your reports are really appreciated! -Maxim Mike Harding wrote: > > Max - please test changes before checking in... I may switch to KDE > because gnome doesn't build half the time, and a lot of the problems > are very simple, a 'make clean && make' would at least be a good test. > > I tend to rip out the base ports, like gnomelibs, and rebuild, but I > can be out of commmision for hours because of stuff like this. > > Also, you don't bump the point release so I can test that ports build > before I rebuild - I had tested gnomelibs, which was the only one that > had a version bump, and the compile died elsewhere. > > - MIke H. > > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/panel-- doesn't build because the patch files > are not correct... > > netcom1# ===> Extracting for panelmm-0.3.1 > >> Checksum OK for gnome/panelmm-0.3.1.tar.gz. > ===> panelmm-0.3.1 depends on executable: gmake - found > ===> panelmm-0.3.1 depends on file: /usr/X11R6/bin/gnomecc - found > ===> panelmm-0.3.1 depends on shared library: gnomemm.9 - not found > ===> Verifying install for gnomemm.9 in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gnome-- > ===> Extracting for gnomemm-1.2.2 > >> Checksum OK for gnomemm-1.2.2.tar.bz2. > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on executable: gm4 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on executable: gmake - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on executable: libtool - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on file: /usr/X11R6/bin/gnomecc - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gtkmm.2 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: esd.2 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: glib12.3 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gtk12.2 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: Imlib.5 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gnome.5 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: panel_status.5 - found > ===> gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gtkhtml.21 - found > ===> Patching for gnomemm-1.2.2 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for gnomemm-1.2.2 > File to patch: > > or > > No file to patch. Skipping... > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to src/gnome--/app.cc.rej > >> Patch patch-src::gnome--::app.cc failed to apply cleanly. > >> Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in patch-aa patch-src::gnome--::affinetrans.cc applied cleanly. > *** Error code 1 > > depending how I invoke it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020716160653.615C013109>