From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 12:04:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD7216A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:04:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.30.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFC043D3F for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:04:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au) Received: from robbins.dropbear.id.au (210.50.112.132) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.028) id 412F6C1400085D1C; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:04:13 +1000 Received: by robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D0D174207; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:04:06 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:04:06 +1000 From: Tim Robbins To: Achilleus Mantzios Message-ID: <20040829120406.GA52614@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Transition from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 to 5.3-BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:04:15 -0000 On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:58:41AM +0300, Achilleus Mantzios wrote: > Hi, after make buildworld,make buildkernel, make install kernel > i rebooted single-user, just to find out that > ls, mount, etc.. gave > ls exited with signal 12, > bad system call. > > After i rebooted with the old 5.1 kernel and did make buildkernel > *with* COMPAT_FREEBSD4, i could reboot single user with > 5.3 and run ls,mount, etc... just fine. This was covered by the 20031112 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING. As a general rule, you should use GENERIC instead of a custom kernel configuration (or a GENERIC config from a previous release) when updating, at least on branches that aren't marked -STABLE. > What has COMPAT_FREEBSD4 has to do, since i *didnt* have it in my > 5.1-RELEASE-p10, and no FreeBSD 4.x programs were run? I believe the rationale was that no -STABLE releases after FreeBSD 4 used the old statfs() interface. I agree that the name is misleading. Tim