From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 07:50:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D128A16A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:50:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [222.146.51.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7B643D62; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:50:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p33074-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [219.161.176.74]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65551ECA; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:50:25 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6T7nNA2000970; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:49:24 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:49:11 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040729.164911.02302593.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: des@des.no From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: <20040728205248.GI424@submonkey.net> <20040728213909.GA94208@gothmog.gr> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.65 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Thu_Jul_29_16_49_11_2004_932)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ceri@FreeBSD.org cc: doc@FreeBSD.org cc: keramida@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re:
vs. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:50:27 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Jul_29_16_49_11_2004_932)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote in : des> Giorgos Keramidas writes: des> > I'm not sure if it was a matter of personal taste or if he had s= omething des> > else in mind. I'd like to hear what he has to say too before de= ciding des> > for or against some style rule. des> = des> I believe is deprecated in newer DocBook versions. My mai= n des> reason for preferring
, though, is that it makes life a l= ot des> easier if you ever need to move sections up or down. I do not think it will be deprecated. nwalsh clearly says "The non-recursive forms are imperative" in DocBook RFE ID#438018= .= -- = | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Jul_29_16_49_11_2004_932)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBCKv3TyzT2CeTzy0RAn8YAJ99aRANQJDdmbGvJY/6BwK/NoAhcwCfUATB 4mczG/1bWXs5M7tx3zGBtak= =VEiA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Jul_29_16_49_11_2004_932)----