From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 23 23:15: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d160.as28.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.71.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7D837B401; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 23:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5O6H7cv051276; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:17:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from localhost (silby@localhost) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id g5O6H4D4051273; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:17:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:17:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: "Kenneth D. Merry" Cc: net@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot In-Reply-To: <20020623233627.A44237@panzer.kdm.org> Message-ID: <20020624011221.L50974-100000@patrocles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it. Out of curiousity, what happens when the page being write()n is a mmap'd page shared by multiple processes? Will the page be shared? That could be a big reduction in mbuf cluster usage on some http/ftp systems, I'd guess. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message