From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 17 22:41:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6786A16AE30 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 22:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsf@ns.live555.com) Received: from ns.live555.com (ns.live555.com [66.80.62.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799B043D66 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 22:41:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsf@ns.live555.com) Received: from ns.live555.com (localhost.live555.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns.live555.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HMfqC5056769 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:41:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rsf@ns.live555.com) Received: (from rsf@localhost) by ns.live555.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4HMfpH9056766; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:41:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rsf) Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.1.20060517153640.01e0f568@live555.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:40:56 -0700 To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org From: Ross Finlayson In-Reply-To: <446B8F14.80502@errno.com> References: <7.0.1.0.1.20060517080119.01e00df8@live555.com> <446B44B0.5030908@errno.com> <7.0.1.0.1.20060517125415.01e0f568@live555.com> <446B8F14.80502@errno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: More 'resource' problems with "ath0" X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:41:56 -0000 >Are any of the stations associated to these systems operating in power >save mode? No, I don't use power save mode. (One of the servers is at home, where all of its clients are plugged in to AC power. The other server is at a local coffee shop, where the owner wants to discourage people from camping there for hours :-) > Is there some reason you have the cards locked to 11b? If >not, you should be able to let them operate in 11g. In each case, the back-end Internet connection is only 1.5 Mbps, so the extra bitrate of 11g was not needed. However, on your suggestion, I'll try running both servers at 11g now. Ross.