From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 20 10:26:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA16930 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 10:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (SRI-56K-FR.mt.net [206.127.65.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA16922 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 10:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA27468; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 11:25:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA24051; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 11:25:54 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 11:25:54 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199709201725.LAA24051@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tom Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: >8 char usernames going into 2.2.5? In-Reply-To: References: <19929.874708211@time.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan writes: > it was definitely never our > intention to go to >8 character usernames in the 2.2-stable branch. > > I'd like to register strong disagreement with the above. And I'd like to register my full support that it stay. So, who wins? :) (It's a change that goes against the charter of -stable, so it should stay out.) Nate