From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 6 3:29:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A367037B403 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:29:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f56AbcU02834; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:37:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200106061037.f56AbcU02834@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: j mckitrick Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: newbussifying drivers In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:21:51 BST." <20010606112151.D10263@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 03:37:38 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > | You manually set the correct I/O port in the hints file and then you > > Sorry if i misunderstand, but isn't the hints file only for -current? I was > under the impression it was only to simplify driver development. > > Since my goal is to clean up the driver under the newbus system, how would > this port address issue be handled under -stable? Hints aren't appropriate in this situation; please see the lengthy response I posted to your code question. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message