Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 12:44:20 -0700 From: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> To: Erich Boleyn <erich@uruk.org> Cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: APIC_IO stuff Message-ID: <199612031944.MAA00118@clem.systemsix.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Dec 1996 11:40:28 PST." <E0vV0hg-0008Ap-00@uruk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Erich, > I haven't had much time to try to solve the syscons problem, so I've > been running SMP by remote login over ethernet. > > Last night I tried an interesting experiment, just run the APIC_IO > version but don't start the second CPU. It has run all night and > through til noon today with no problems (I did a few moderate compiles). resup and retry, the version you have was broken big-time. you should be able to run 2 CPUS & APIC_IO without problem. If syscons is still a problem you could try using pcvt instead. --- > P.S.: When I mentioned all the CPUs being started up at some earlier > date, I may have been smoking something. It only does anything > with one of the other CPUs in my test box since I've looked > carefully at it again. > this is kinda good, it means your board is acting consistantly with the other known 4 CPU board being tested. 4 CPU support is off again, but we are probably pretty close to attempting it again, just will require a manual start of the APs. Peter could better decsribe where we stand on this issue. -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | FreeBSD -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzHe7tEAAAEEAM274wAEEdP+grIrV6UtBt54FB5ufifFRA5ujzflrvlF8aoE 04it5BsUPFi3jJLfvOQeydbegexspPXL6kUejYt2OeptHuroIVW5+y2M2naTwqtX WVGeBP6s2q/fPPAS+g+sNZCpVBTbuinKa/C4Q6HJ++M9AyzIq5EuvO0a8Rr9AAUR tBlTdGV2ZSBQYXNzZSA8c21wQGNzbi5uZXQ+ =ds99 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612031944.MAA00118>