From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 00:52:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC5316A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from sally.dts-online.net (sally.dts-online.net [212.62.68.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0078C43D49; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from door.koellers.net (213-182-112-170.teleos-web.de [213.182.112.170]) by sally.dts-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE6148D84E; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:52:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from odie.koellers.net (root@odie.koellers.net [192.168.4.2]) by door.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i078kpke035615; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:46:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from odie.koellers.net (lkoeller@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by odie.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i078kppZ001556; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:46:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@odie.koellers.net) Message-Id: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 From: "Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?=" To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: Message from Doug Barton <20040106101604.N88773@znfgre.qbhto.arg> X-Face: eCcoCV}FjV*O{6>[1$XP/e%]TJhEw2MF33dFh)^HM7Gfd=[/(4+0a$~ cc: "lkoeller@freebsd.org" cc: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:52:18 -0000 In reply to Doug Barton who wrote: >On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Lars K=F6ller wrote: > >> 910 is chosen cause bacula uses the TCP ports 9101, 9102 and 9103 >> (IANA registered). Perhaps they could be included into /etc/system: > >Since every line we add to /etc/services adds expense to the various >getportby*() functions, we only add new lines when it can be >demonstrated that it would benefit a large percentage of our userbase. >How many people do you think use this bacula port? Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD = user are on the bacula mailing list. It's nice to have the ports in /etc/services when using tolls like = lsof. = Thanks = Lars -- = Lars K=F6ller E-Mail: lars@koellers.net (LKoeller@FreeBSD.ORG) -------- FreeBSD, was sonst? ---- http://www.de.freebsd.org --------