From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 23:18:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52CF16A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:18:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7518C43D3F for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:18:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83205F23; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:18:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54118-03; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:18:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-236-186.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.236.186]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB845E65; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:18:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41F6D3A9.2010107@mac.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:18:01 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gert Cuykens References: <200501242315.12888.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <200501251530.06424.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <20050125055301.GB16896@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050125194736.GD76109@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050125224732.GA28662@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: perl and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:18:27 -0000 Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:47:32 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: [ ... ] > no why would it irritate developers ? Its just a question ? i only > want them to think a bit before they bring in perl to build there > application. > > I am not a developer so i can not think for them i can only ask > questions. I would not even ask them if the application itself would > use it. Then i would accept it as part of a furniture. Let's put it this way: before you ask someone to remove Perl from a port, try to make the port work without Perl yourself. In many cases, you will not be able to do so, because the dependency on Perl exists because it is needed for the port to function. While you are right that developers should not include unnecessary dependencies on Perl, lots of software is written in that language.... -- -Chuck