From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 02:21:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7DC16A4CE for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 02:21:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1237643D2D for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 02:21:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C0F1DDDB5; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 03:21:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 86057-01; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 03:21:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC06C1DDDAE; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 03:21:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from rincewind.ijs.si (rincewind.ijs.si [193.2.4.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0314F1C00725; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 03:21:13 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Kris Kennaway Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 03:21:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20041129195108.GC8315@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412010158.03269.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20041201010904.GA81098@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041201010904.GA81098@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412010321.11891.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@dosirak.kr.freebsd.org: zh-chinput2-1.3.1 failed on i386 5] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 02:21:20 -0000 On Wednesday 01 of December 2004 02:09, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:58:03AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 of December 2004 01:19, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:12:34AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > > > This one needs to add imake to BUILD_DEPENDS. I've notified the > > > > maintainer. > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > Thanks for looking at these. If you're not already doing so, add > > > these to the latest version of your patch so we can commit them all at > > > once when we're ready to go. > > > > > > Kris > > > > I was worried that it would put too much into single patch/commit, but > > I'll merge it if it's preferred. I'll look into other errors and notify > > maintainers. It seems that it's either missing imake or not building html > > man pages that were in plists. > > It's best to be able to commit them all at once instead of leaving a > window where a number of ports will be broken for an indeterminate > timeperiod. > > Kris Ah, I see. Then how about this: there appear to be basicaly two cathegories of breaks. First are the ones that can be commited even before xorg upgrade (like rosegarden and zh-chinput2). Rosegarden is maintained by ports so I thought of waiting a day or so if someone objects or comes up with better idea, and then commit it. (and during writing this it seems that fix for libxklavier was commited). I intended to notify maintainers of the ones that are maintained and if we don't hear from them until the time xorg is ready for commit I can commit them separately, but at the same time (if they respond earlier, the commits can also be done earlier). Another ones are closely related to commit (like ja-kdrill) since their plist changes as consequence of not installing html man pages. These should be commited together with upgrade and I can merge those into the patch and notify maintainers that this will be done. Would that be acceptable? Dejan