Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:59:40 +0200
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To:        darklogik@pittgoth.com
Cc:        freeBSD-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: oops, forgot [PATCH]
Message-ID:  <20011228105940.A3681@straylight.oblivion.bg>
In-Reply-To: <3C2B3589.31878.FF4236@localhost>; from darklogik@pittgoth.com on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 02:51:53PM -0800
References:  <3C2B3589.31878.FF4236@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 02:51:53PM -0800, darklogik@pittgoth.com wrote:
> Sorry to everyone who reads, I sent a new pr but never put PATCH 
> in the title.  I also threw a patch for both gnats updates, which I 
> didn't know if I should have just replyed with patch or keep the 
> subject the same.  Could someone could clear this up with me, if I 
> send a followup that contains a patch, changing the actual subject 
> will not permit a follow up in the database correct?  Or will it as 
> long as I put Re: docs/<pr number>: in the subject... sorry for the 
> very stupid question...

As long as the subject contains "docs/<pr number>" near the beginning,
GNATS will file it in the PR's audit trail.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
If you think this sentence is confusing, then change one pig.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011228105940.A3681>