From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Mon Apr 29 19:22:09 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66557159A55C
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:22:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5146CE8E
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:22:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x3TJM5ot059851
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:22:05 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from localhost (puchar-wojtek@localhost)
 by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x3TJM5vq059848;
 Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:22:05 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:22:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: very low performance tcp/rsh
In-Reply-To: <ef440d5f-c543-148a-4e68-44b0bc62b28f@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1904292111080.57162@puchar.net>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1904292028400.48623@puchar.net>
 <ef440d5f-c543-148a-4e68-44b0bc62b28f@grosbein.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7A5146CE8E
X-Spamd-Bar: ------
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wojtek@puchar.net designates 194.1.144.90
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wojtek@puchar.net
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[puchar.net];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: puchar.net];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.966,0];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[90.144.1.194.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0];
 IP_SCORE(-3.51)[ip: (-9.26), ipnet: 194.1.144.0/24(-4.63), asn: 43476(-3.70),
 country: PL(0.07)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:43476, ipnet:194.1.144.0/24, country:PL];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:22:09 -0000

create 32GB hole-file

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=32k seek=1m count=0

fetch -o /dev/null over ftp (proftpd) gives 1.4GB/s

proftpd consumed 100% of single core. much better.

tested with FreeBSD ftpd  - 1.7GB/s

seems like freebsd can saturate 10Gb/s ethernet with single core (Intel(R) 
Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz)


Still where is the most overhead? one memcopy to packet buffers+creating 
packet headers (send).

reception is on separate process taking another core.


still - quite good. But compared to filesystem overhead - large.