From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Mar 19 18:46:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mailsrv.amplex.net (mailsrv.amplex.net [209.57.124.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272D37B737 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:46:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@amplex.net) Received: from mark2000 (dhcp58.amplex.net [209.57.124.58]) (authenticated) by mailsrv.amplex.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2K2jiX36989; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:45:44 -0500 (EST) From: "Mark Radabaugh - Amplex" To: "'Chet Hosey'" Cc: Subject: RE: Sendmail+STARTTLS Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:44:57 -0500 Message-ID: <00f901c0b0e7$c078f3a0$3a7c39d1@mark2000> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I think I know what you are refering to... add: define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A') to your sendmail.mc file and recreate sendmail.mc. Seems to me I also deleted mail-auth-info (not sure on this one.. try it and see if it does what you want). Seems to make it happier with Exchange. Mark Radabaugh Amplex (419) 833-3635 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Chet Hosey > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 9:28 PM > To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Sendmail+STARTTLS > > > Has anyone successfully used sendmail with TLS? I'm being denied by an > Exchange server, since sendmail will automatically try to use > TLS if the > server offers it, even if sendmail has not been given > certificates, etc. > > Is it possible, without a recompile, to prevent sendmail from using > STARTTLS when acting as a client? > > > Incidentally, I'm a recently converted long-time Linux admin. > While I am > generally impressed with the quality of FreeBSD vs. the hackish Linux > environment, I am disappointed that a feature which, when > misconfigured, > could severely limit interoperability would be enabled by > default and yet > remain so poorly documented. That this might be the case is > one of the few > things that darkens my view of an otherwise impressive OS. Is there a > place to which one wanting to stay in the know might look for help? > > I dislike the thought of interrupted service, especially if I > might have > overlooked an obvious source of information. > > Thanks in advance for any help you might provide. > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > Chet Hosey > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message