Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:21:25 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: is this for OO-2 for FBSD? Message-ID: <4726A335.2080103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071029201941.GA99664@thought.org> References: <20071029201941.GA99664@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary Kline wrote: > I'm in the middle of upgrading some platforms and just caught > OOo_OOG680_m6_source.tar.bz2 (278MB) being downloaded. The port > says that this is OO-2.3, but the build says Ishould have > 11GB of disk and ~2GB of memory. > > I somehow downloaded OO_2.3 as a package on one platform. Does > this make any sense? How many of us have 2 gigs of memory? > Seems more than a biit irrational to me. Or did my > portupgrade -aP grab the wrong port? > It got the right port... OOo-2 from ports is really odd anyways... some people seem to be able to get it made right out of the box and others can't as far I can tell there is no rhyme or reason as to why it fails or does not fail.... just install from a package (I have attempted to compile it at least 30 different times/ways and every single one fails on the same set of files [I even went back and reinstalled every port it depends on using settings recommended on various places]).... look back in the archives for my last or second last post to -qeustions for the latest (failed) attempt. -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems Developer, not Business, Friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4726A335.2080103>