From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 11 17:50:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839561065673; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45258FC1E; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so1547840obb.13 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IoKRW5GAuiGUyDxBLFlvneRGCPvKYUOjtbz4KVeHpjs=; b=0c4KHHMKhhRFihKStLGoqeR+r5Dy5mKClDQxQmNd3npD5NdpPzLZ3M89IQu6P2mUGv Uscf/NEtyQJd9ruEf3PtTIVA8eQxdXoh7dK5+s4vZSSuKskimMLp7rREkND3gstLmm0u 9vtIi4GAc/LuviKBBJWTNycHKjvfoBTdNDRWasESMmRQiqwp5TltOflU17xDlQKKH8PX bnjf3j+NXTbOgNLLGejQ9fg636U9xtIvVccCem5agUXMyPFKTpde9pF8qKbWPrCjVilp 9pV/W6XRcPT+cKMVWUc0CkQvyDR9qB+c1eKuh0eF2GgKbG69Wc0Wiyer8aZ2DuBhwzYa W5TA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.231.6 with SMTP id tc6mr19140692obc.63.1347385803031; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.130 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:50:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120911171948.GA81334@freebsd.org> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <504F4A6B.4010001@coosemans.org> <20120911151230.GB87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120911171948.GA81334@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:50:02 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Roman Divacky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans , Dimitry Andric , current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:50:04 -0000 On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Roman Divacky wrote: > > Can you please provide a small self contained test case that shows > that clang is doing worse on accuracy than gcc? > > So that we can analyze it and decide if it's a bug in the code or > in the compiler. So far we know absolutely nothing. > Not to speak for Steve, but he provided this information in another thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-September/036410.html -- Adam Vande More