From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 18 02:38:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECAB16A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:38:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta5p.point.ne.jp (mta5p.point.ne.jp [210.188.175.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409EB43D1D for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:38:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pwd8jmr22w@me.point.ne.jp) Received: from vc3.point.ne.jp ([211.1.103.130]) by mta5p.point.ne.jp with ESMTP id <20050118023823.YLOC24150.mta5p@vc3.point.ne.jp>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:38:23 +0900 Received: from fvc2-p.point.ne.jp (fvc2.point.ne.jp [210.188.175.77]) by vc3.point.ne.jp (Scanmail) with ESMTP id 4B1392EFC2; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:38:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([218.230.54.236]) by fvc2-p.point.ne.jp with ESMTP id <20050118023823.UVOB178.fvc2-p@[218.230.54.236]>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:38:23 +0900 Message-ID: <41ECF531.6040300@me.point.ne.jp> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:38:25 +0000 From: Srot BULL User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050109) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jeremy C. Reed" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Chat-ML FreeBSD Subject: Re: Just to make sure that I am following the correct FreeBSD ML rules/etiquettes X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pwd8jmr22w@me.point.ne.jp List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 02:38:26 -0000 Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Srot BULL wrote: >>Now, what if I need to follow-up another question that is not much related >>to my original post but a little to the response that the people gave me. >>Assuming the above, do I need to post another topic for the above or should >>I just continue to respond and ask the above question in the same thread? > Without looking at the thread, I'd say that just replying to same thread > should be fine since it was related. > Also, if the thread really begins to change focus, often changing the > Subject line is fine, such as "Subject: new subject (was: old subject)" O.K., Thank you I got it... Srot BULL