From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Tue Jul 14 10:49:55 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174A499C815
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DC6BE7
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t6EAnsIA063047
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:49:54 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199559] [patch][regression] ggatel(8) broken on i386 after
 r238119
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:49:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: bin
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-199559-8-Sinq0zoeho@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199559-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199559-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:49:55 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199559

--- Comment #1 from commit-hook@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: brueffer
Date: Tue Jul 14 10:49:37 UTC 2015
New revision: 285531
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285531

Log:
  Unbreak ggatec and ggatel on i386 after r238119, which added two more
  'struct g_gate_ctl_create' fields.

  While the behaviour was technically undefined on other architectures
  as well, on the reporter's amd64 systems the uninitialized bytes the
  kernel cares about were always zero so everything worked as expected.

  PR:        197309, 199559
  Submitted by:    ota@j.email.ne.jp, Fabian Keil
  Reviewed by:    pjd
  MFC after:    1 week

Changes:
  head/sbin/ggate/ggatec/ggatec.c
  head/sbin/ggate/ggatel/ggatel.c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.