From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 26 22:47:27 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5163E16A4E9
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:47:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com)
Received: from cheyenne.sixcompanies.com (cheyenne.sixcompanies.com
	[65.43.82.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074443D7D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:47:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com)
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060826174612.01982d10@sixcompanies.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:48:00 -0500
To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>,
	Duane Hill <d.hill@yournetplus.com>
From: "J.D. Bronson" <jbronson@wixb.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060826221904.GD2666@gothmog.pc>
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060826150124.01982d10@sixcompanies.com>
	<20060826204015.GI1311@gothmog.pc>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20060826160530.01982d10@sixcompanies.com>
	<20060826220706.GC2666@gothmog.pc>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20060826170941.01982d10@sixcompanies.com>
	<20060826221904.GD2666@gothmog.pc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "J.D. Bronson" <jbronson@wixb.com>
Subject: Re: ipfilter on 6.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:47:27 -0000

At 05:19 PM 8/26/2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:

>You are implicitly blocking all traffic on the lo0 interface (by the
>modified default policy to "block" all traffic, and missing an explicit
>rule to allow lo0 traffic).
>
>When a system tries to connect to itself, it uses lo0/127.0.0.1 and this
>is not possible with your setup.
>
>I hope this helps a bit,
>
>-- Giorgos


Oh geez....I cant believe I forgot lo0. HOW STUPID.
I will edit this and take another look at it.

once I have this working..I still want to figure out why pf was not happy.

Thanks for pointing this out guys...I feel foolish, but glad someone told me.

-JD