From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Tue Sep 15 01:34:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8672CA04B21; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F0F106B; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 728CD1945; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:34:21 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Aleksandr Rybalko Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r287782 - stable/10/sys/dev/vt Message-ID: <20150915013421.GA59565@FreeBSD.org> References: <201509141442.t8EEg7ao012596@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201509141442.t8EEg7ao012596@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:34:21 -0000 On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:42:07PM +0000, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > New Revision: 287782 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/287782 > > Log: > MFC: r272715 > Allow vt(4) to disable terminal bell with > `sysctl kern.vt.bell_enable=0`, similar as syscons(4) do. > [...] > +VT_SYSCTL_INT(enable_bell, 1, "Enable bell"); I think you've meant `sysctl kern.vt.enable_bell=0' in the commit log. > + if (!vt_enable_bell) > + return; > + > if (vd->vd_flags & VDF_QUIET_BELL) > return; Hm, I'm wondering why having another sysctl is required when there's already a way to shut the bell up with VDF_QUIET_BELL flag? Also, there's certain naming inconsistency between syscons(4) and vt(4). On my stable/8 laptop, I see this: $ sysctl -d hw.syscons.bell hw.syscons.bell: enable bell On my -CURRENT desktop, this: $ sysctl -d kern.vt.enable_bell kern.vt.enable_bell: Enable bell ./danfe