From owner-freebsd-security Tue Dec 23 13:57:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA13151 for security-outgoing; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 13:57:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security) Received: from gvr.gvr.org (root@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA13144 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 13:57:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from guido@gvr.org) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id WAA08209; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 22:45:17 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199712232145.WAA08209@gvr.gvr.org> Subject: Re: land.c patch for 2.2.5-RELEASE In-Reply-To: from Jonah Kowall at "Dec 19, 97 07:14:32 pm" To: jkowall@coffeehaus.net (Jonah Kowall) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 22:45:17 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jonah Kowall wrote: > Does anyone have the "final" patch released, as well as the final F00F > patch for the kernel. Sorry to bother you busy bees, but I am in > desperate need of the land patch asap. > There has been an advisory on the f00f stuff. A land advisory is in the make. The felling is that the -current solution is not the right one. You can apply the solution in -current to -stable though. -Guido