From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Apr 12 15:52:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from dojo.tao.ca (tao.ca [198.96.117.188])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1E937B43E
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from anarcat@tao.ca)
Received: by dojo.tao.ca (Postfix, from local user)
	id 094E54E9E; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:52:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:52:19 -0500
From: anarcat <anarcat@tao.ca>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: netstat not displaying smtpd
Message-ID: <20010412175219.A15974@dojo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Uptime: 5:44pm  up 1 day,  3:42, 11 users,  load average: 0.87, 0.52, 0.44
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi.

I have a strange behavior here on 4.3-BETA. sockstat tells me I have a
mail server and a sshd running, but not where:

khan# sockstat
USER     COMMAND    PID   FD PROTO  LOCAL ADDRESS         FOREIGN
ADDRESS     =20
root     master    1354   10 ?      ?                     ?                =
   =20
root     sshd       634    4 ?      ?                     ?                =
   =20
root     sshd       295    4 ?      ?                     ?                =
   =20
root     sshd       241    3 ?      ?                     ?                =
   =20

USER     COMMAND    PID   FD PROTO  LOCAL ADDRESS         FOREIGN
ADDRESS     =20
root     master    1354    9 ?      ?                     ?                =
   =20

Examining netstat gives even stranger output:

# netstat -Aan -f inet
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Socket   Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address      Foreign Address
(state)
#

ie, nothing.=20

But I *do* have a mailserver and a sshd running there.

I wonder, could that be the result of a too-restrictive ipfw?

Thanks,

A.

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjrWMaEACgkQ7uV99pHLOSI5hQCfQipLkyQXEsgxbBSB9E2KL8dy
hjUAnj+Dyr3p2a1ro3f/J0lk3Lcy3kjB
=UUTN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message