From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 10:22:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF368106567C for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) Received: from inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net (inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net [41.161.16.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3D48FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) Received: from [41.241.31.168] (helo=clue.co.za) by inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Kv8Bt-0005vn-PL for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:22:17 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=clue.co.za) by clue.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Kv8Bs-0004Wq-Fh for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:22:16 +0200 To: current@freebsd.org From: "Ian Freislich" X-Attribution: BOFH Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:22:16 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: Subject: LSI megaraid SATA 150-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:22:21 -0000 Hi I was wondering if anyone is successfully using this device on -CURRENT: amr0: mem 0xcfff0000-0xcfffffff irq 17 at device 7.0 on pci1 amr0: Using 64-bit DMA amr0: [ITHREAD] amr0: Firmware 713S, BIOS G121, 64MB RAM I've had "limited" success on 7.0-STABLE where success is limited to (RAID5 and RAID1): 1. The kernel detecting the device and logical disk. 2. fdisk, label and newfs the logical disk. 3. Mounting the logical disk. 4. Copying my data onto the logical disk. But I'm unable to boot into multi-user off the disk. The kernel boots and then I get reports of UFS corruption (truncated inodes and missing blocks etc) and it can't find /libexec/ld-elf.so.1. I'm tempted to just say that the card is junk and to give up. Am I correct in my analysis? Ian -- Ian Freislich