From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 24 10:15:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237D116A4BF for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd6mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5E843FCB for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr4so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.215]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003)) freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:14:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml5so.prod.shaw.ca (pn2ml5so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.149]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003)) freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:14:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk (h24-87-233-42.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.233.42])2003)) freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:14:34 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:14:31 -0700 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <20030824170354.GA9172@rot13.obsecurity.org> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca To: Kris Kennaway , Colin Percival Message-id: <5.0.2.1.1.20030824100546.02c8cc00@popserver.sfu.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <5.0.2.1.1.20030824064019.02d7d090@popserver.sfu.ca> <5.0.2.1.1.20030824064019.02d7d090@popserver.sfu.ca> cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EoL dates X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 17:15:57 -0000 At 10:03 24/08/2003 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:45:50AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > > Is there any reason why releases have EoL dates after only 12 > > months? > >They are supported by unpaid volunteers who have a limit to the amount >of free time they can donate to the project. Either I'm missing your point, or you're missing my point. There are five release branches now which are "not officially supported", but I have yet to see any circumstance where they have, in fact, not been supported. If those branches were not being supported because people were too busy to support them, I'd understand perfectly; but as far as I can see, those branches *are* being supported. Colin Percival