From owner-freebsd-smp  Tue Apr 29 21:08:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA01880
          for smp-outgoing; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meshsv64.os.mesh.ad.jp (meshsv64.os.mesh.ad.jp [133.205.64.132])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA01870
          for <smp@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cubic.shisham.co.jp (tksm1DS01.tks.mesh.ad.jp [133.205.221.121]) by meshsv64.os.mesh.ad.jp (8.8.4+2.7Wbeta4/3.5Wpl1-) with ESMTP id NAA07368; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:08:03 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cubic.shisham.co.jp (8.8.4+2.7Wbeta4/3.5Wbeta) with ESMTP id NAA00917; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:07:35 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <Lucky.199704300407.NAA00917.Lucky>
To: vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu
Cc: smp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re:  why general protection fault happen on SMP kernel?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Apr 1997 20:47:42 -0600"
References: <199704300247.UAA08040@fast.cs.utah.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.69 on Emacs 19.34.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:07:35 +0900
From: SHIBA <shiba@mxs.meshnet.or.jp>
Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>><199704300247.UAA08040@fast.cs.utah.edu>
>>> vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu (Kevin Van Maren) wrote
Kevin> >        GA-686DX
Kevin> >        P6 180M * 2 (overclocking now(233M))
Kevin> >        tekram dc-390f
Kevin> >        asus   sc-200
Kevin> >        dec    de500-xa

Kevin> Try running your 180's at 180, and see if you still get the GPF.

thanks,
	180--->200 (233->200 ;_;)
	OK.

but kernel execute on 233MHz before Apr. 20 (about)

why?