From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 30 23:38:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5834C37B410 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f916cdv14027; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 08:38:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: Bart Kus , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sio modification In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2001 22:27:53 PDT." <3BB7FED9.D91FAA2E@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 08:38:39 +0200 Message-ID: <14025.1001918319@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <3BB7FED9.D91FAA2E@mindspring.com>, Terry Lambert writes: >Bart Kus wrote: >> If I do have to write something, for my work to be included anywhere, I >> should be writing for the -CURRENT kernel, right? I presently run -STABLE, >> so that would obviously be the more comfortable kernel to write for...but it >> is *STABLE* after all. > >Most of us doing commercial developement write for -stable, and >give it out to be ported to -current by someone else, if we don't >have the time to do both. With the amount of code you have had to get integrated in our tree I can truly see how the workload would overwhelm you. Submissions should contain a -current version or they are likely to never make it into the tree... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message