From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Feb 11 03:50:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA16821
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 03:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA16807;
          Tue, 11 Feb 1997 03:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 03:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199702111150.DAA16807@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
Subject: Re: bin/777 patch had problems with closed tty... 
Reply-To: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/777; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, freebsd-gnats-submit@freefall.freebsd.org,
        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: bin/777 patch had problems with closed tty... 
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 22:36:45 +1100

 On Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:30:02 -0800 (PST)  John-Mark Gurney wrote:
 
 > comments?  is it ok if we change the default??  
 > 
 
 I don't like changing the default.  I'd rather see no fix than do
 this.
 
 I sent in an alternative patch that is ugly but does solve the problem
 without much code change.
 
 Giles