From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 16:16:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DC9106566B for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.scheidell@secnap.com) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1F48FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BEF621C46 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:16:17 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secnap.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:subject :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:date:date:message-id; s=dkim; t=1328112976; x=1329927376; bh=szZDy3oItCzVgJcuH2Uznnk3 0P4dLduYV4D5QQCcUc0=; b=QleTjA7li5c96f/eYBRIbi89/iBZheWbhn+13cpu ikKI4+mD1GE7iOH+LASJs6UTWLO+KKxv1+ElvaFcQR4jpAAHPsL960UDUpYnH58U kbLsn4s/z9h+RgnYvUponykGtiCmY+gaxttMsJDqWWCX0/PiRrpOxJGfEzMgX9u9 zYU= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E691C621C45 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:16:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:16:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4F296566.805@secnap.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:16:38 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: not for arch? use arch? don't care arch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:16:18 -0000 what is todays favorite way of doing this: (i sent this question to submitter): > I had a question, and just for the logs: > > you removed this in the Makefile, but in your fix log, you didn't > mention that you got it to compile on sparc64. > > -.if ${ARCH} == "sparc64" > -BROKEN= Does not compile on sparc64 > -.endif > - > > did you mean to remove that test or does it compile on sparc64? his reply is this: "The ChangeLog mentioned some sparc64 fixes, so it's worth giving it a try again, but the port depends on boost-libs now which is marked as broken on sparc64, so it cannot actually be tested." So, how do you want me to handle this? NOT_FOR_ARCHS sparc64? or just let PH die trying to include boost-libs? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com/ ______________________________________________________________________