From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 14:26:07 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B7C106566B
	for <geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.129])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6B28FC0C
	for <geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275)
	id 5FEBF7309E; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:31:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:31:16 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <20090113143116.GA93244@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
	<29945.1231856558@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <29945.1231856558@critter.freebsd.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: geom 'taste' vs. manual creation ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:26:08 -0000

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 02:22:38PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
> >geom(4) says:
> >
> >   A geom which came into being as a result of a normal taste operation
> >   should self-destruct...
> >
> >Now I wonder:
> >does the GEOM infrastructure record whether a geom has been created
> >by a 'taste' call, or manually through a 'geom xxx create ..', or
> >this info should be managed directly by the individual implementation ?
> 
> No, there is no difference on how a geom is created.  The above
> statement indicates a level of magic that is not really there, all
> the geoms get orphaned the same way.

ok thanks
luigi