Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:31:16 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geom 'taste' vs. manual creation ? Message-ID: <20090113143116.GA93244@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <29945.1231856558@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <29945.1231856558@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 02:22:38PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>, Luigi Rizzo writes: > >geom(4) says: > > > > A geom which came into being as a result of a normal taste operation > > should self-destruct... > > > >Now I wonder: > >does the GEOM infrastructure record whether a geom has been created > >by a 'taste' call, or manually through a 'geom xxx create ..', or > >this info should be managed directly by the individual implementation ? > > No, there is no difference on how a geom is created. The above > statement indicates a level of magic that is not really there, all > the geoms get orphaned the same way. ok thanks luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090113143116.GA93244>