From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 5 10:58:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AB216A41F for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:58:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru) Received: from ints.mail.pike.ru (ints.mail.pike.ru [85.30.199.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC7A43D46 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:58:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru) Received: (qmail 54963 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2005 10:58:01 -0000 Received: from cicuta.babolo.ru (85.30.224.245) by ints.mail.pike.ru with SMTP; 5 Oct 2005 10:58:01 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 8754 invoked by uid 136); Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:01:38 -0000 X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=KOI8-R; no-hdr-encoding=1 In-Reply-To: <1128485315.80787.TMDA@seddon.ca> To: "Dave+Seddon" Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:01:38 +0400 (MSD) From: .@babolo.ru X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <1128510098.391180.8753.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> Cc: 'Benjamin Rosenblum' , Darren Pilgrim , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which em(4) chips work/don't work? [Was: RE: dummynet, em driver, device polling issues :-((] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:58:21 -0000 [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > > Would an official person care to chime in about putting together a card/chip > > vs. em(4) bugs matrix? No sense, because bugs depend not on/only card/chip, but at least load. In my expierence quality of em interface depends on quantity of ipfw rules, pipes and on traffic load.