From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 06:13:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C32D5; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 06:13:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BCD75D; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 06:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDD9223F669; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:13:55 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.4 onyx.glenbarber.us EDD9223F669 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:13:43 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: Do we really need articles/cvs-freebsd anymore? Message-ID: <20130208061343.GF81339@glenbarber.us> References: <20130208055308.GA30647@saturn> <20130208055755.GE81339@glenbarber.us> <20130208060757.GA30828@saturn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130208060757.GA30828@saturn> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:13:57 -0000 --YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:07:58AM +0100, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > My personal preference is to ensure we have a matching svn replacement > > before removing the cvs-freebsd/ bits, so we do not leave people > > straggling with converting from one source control system to another, > > or worse, newcomers that cannot find any documentation on the current > > source control system. >=20 > Fair enough. The main point of this article is to help people replicate > the CVS setup that FreeBSD uses. I can work on describing how someone > can replicate the subversion setup of FreeBSD, including access-control > and email notifications, and _then_ we can de-orbit the article and the > cvs-freebsd setup. Yes, this is what I meant. Sorry if that was not clear. I seem to recall an email from Peter a few months ago (likely to -doc@) with a rough synopsis of what is needed to seed and run a local svn mirror. I will need to look for the email, but he had a nice outline of what should be included, and how to do it. Glen --YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRFJeXAAoJEFJPDDeguUajxlkH/iiB0pFIlbrWLNRSHEqYDpxO HyAMaBZ+UT7/OY10akkXr2skM0lLPYj9fPUOcJx01/WDS2yNgnkla02UotYXG5E2 iPwO3caxIxT45EH3Wphb+fSdTwwGxu/Liu9ozmagNzMTRKutOQNLhsWmZcNMHBoC hbvLSM0Sj2VzmCbI+IOLfsIKOdZBfMhTvB+s4375dgUwq4PaYowqbESgcD8IlOCo PHWkgO8mOmcd1iyGyoPn6b9baE38Ja8hOG2LKZBI0qx7GHamgmpGJq1lk/psrU7q VCkStixNTrQVVK63+y4VDp+8zBXwMK5cAidu6LHSG5kd6UeBrcCaLSbJ0FQdXaY= =3+J1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YH9Qf6Fh2G5kB/85--