From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 7 21:18:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA02931 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 21:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pandora.hh.kew.com (root@kendra.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.53.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA02922; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 21:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sonata (sonata.hh.kew.com [192.195.203.135]) by pandora.hh.kew.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA26616; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 00:18:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <34137CC3.E267B6B@kew.com> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 00:19:15 -0400 From: Drew Derbyshire Organization: Kendra Electronic Wonderworks X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en]C-MOENE (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" CC: hackers@hub.freebsd.org, support@kew.com Subject: Re: spam and the FreeBSD mailing lists X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <199709080116.SAA23646@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > uucp mail from is valid. even though i cannot doa DNS on it. > our uucp relay will accept the message and attempt delivery for us. If you are delivering to a UUCP domain, you can do DNS on the MX records. For example, the machine pandora.uucp.kew.com is MX only. DNS is not just address records. So the MAIL FROM address for a UUCP host should either have a valid MX record, or be rewritten to by host!user@relay.fqdn, where of course relay.fqdn has valid address and/or MX records. -- Internet: ahd@kew.com Voice: 617-279-9810 Q. What machine does Windows NT run best on? A. A 35 mm slide projector.