From owner-freebsd-security Thu Nov 11 12:37:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu (broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu [128.84.247.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D938814D6F for ; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:37:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU) Received: from graphics.cornell.edu by broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA298892642; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:37:22 -0500 Message-Id: <199911112037.AA298892642@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Dan Busarow Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Nov 1999 12:00:51 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:37:22 -0500 From: Mitch Collinsworth Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> Oddly, the default ISC install creates an /etc/namedb/named.conf, >> but the named it creates looks for /etc/named.conf. Weird. > >Odd, didn't for me when I installed it, my named.conf isn't actually >in /etc/namedb so it should have if it wanted to. I think this was my mis-interpretation of what I saw. I built and installed named from the ISC src and then looked in /etc/namedb and found a named.conf. Looking now at another FBSD system that has never had named installed on it I see an /etc/namedb/named.conf there, too, so now I'll assume it came from FBSD and not from ISC. oops. -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message