From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 26 08:18:34 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FA2106564A;
	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alexander.bubnov@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com
	[209.85.220.225])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6180D8FC08;
	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:18:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so95399fxm.3
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=x+IFQPw64Ei5aOg2BW8eJfHTpdaYGCms0d0dvcUAE/I=;
	b=nVcWjc4X1twvDh1D7o02mqv2YXlC9eXxvYiTVQ2XB7664ec3cNWfSnufrHCaqxNX5x
	RZxdqaPImjO47XVb+PtqHLkmg1j40st673jnun95ZwcrBZeqsZBY4l8GukhDRQBoeYcb
	cUH87GqNqRztYlbNfOzxNyvfIpa/rrLZI33qU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=D1JwnH1YoIYAt2G/8ItO2So7pWqJq9ZXfnGwjzb3/cHvvi5UUUIQAdbM8a4w9kcxQk
	PCLcCZBArfBLxYlXFpurZu49nD7PC0N6K8BjCzzO9s55gqK4kMaaDJQdh7CVlKJf1iVq
	Avd94E/ACa0qPPU1aP142OTCYcE+CJ2K3tIKI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.252.14 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20100326081637.W46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
References: <4BAB5A77.7050505@mts.com.ua>
	<20100325142149.I44999@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
	<c3e287ff1003252225g8aac72aod2ef2396c28175ee@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100326081637.W46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:18:32 +0300
Received: by 10.102.7.12 with SMTP id 12mr271868mug.104.1269591512229; Fri, 26 
	Mar 2010 01:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c3e287ff1003260118qec87635ie4c696c38cc27a3a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexander Bubnov <alexander.bubnov@gmail.com>
To: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:18:34 -0000

Thanks a lot for your answers.

2010/3/26 Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de>

> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
>
> AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to
> AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of
> AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plus net-snmp has BSD like license.
>
> Many years ago I needed a small SNMP daemon for controlling some
> equipment. I looked at ucd-snmp (that was the name than) but decided
> against it because it was far too big. The even bigger problem was, that
> it didn't care about handling errors in the places I looked at. I use
> bsnmp alot in projects to do remote monitoring controlling of equipment -
> you don't need SNMPv3 for them and it is easy to write a new MIB for
> bsnmp.
>
> harti
>



-- 
/BR, Alexander