Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 06:20:15 -0600 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> Cc: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r500480 - in head: Mk databases databases/rubygem-dbm databases/rubygem-dbm/files lang/ruby24 lang/ruby25 Message-ID: <CAP7rwciDnLGXyg4UH9YX8Hk3QHNNzgbgOLtpiErLoVVaXEwiHw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <yger29iyg7q.wl-ume@FreeBSD.org> References: <201904301122.x3UBMwPN080847@repo.freebsd.org> <yger29iyg7q.wl-ume@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:03 PM Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:22:58 +0000 (UTC) > >>>>> Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> said: > > meta> Log: > meta> lang/ruby2[45]: Remove dbm library and replace it with databases/rubygem-dbm > > meta> +OPTIONS_SINGLE_BACKEND= BDB GDBM LIBC QDBM > meta> +OPTIONS_DEFAULT= BDB > > It seems POLA violation to me. Further, now, there is no way to > access dbm 1.85 database from Ruby by default. LIBC should be > default, IMHO. Is "LIBC" the option I'd pick to get Berkeley DB 1.x support? I'm entirely unclear on that after reading this patch. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAP7rwciDnLGXyg4UH9YX8Hk3QHNNzgbgOLtpiErLoVVaXEwiHw>