From owner-cvs-all  Sun Jun  4 19:18:54 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from merc94.us.sas.com (merc94.us.sas.com [149.173.6.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E095037B7C8; Sun,  4 Jun 2000 19:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jwd@unx.sas.com)
Received: from merc94.us.sas.com ([127.0.0.1]) by merc94.us.sas.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2651.58)
	id LYPT39KB; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 22:18:48 -0400
Received: from 10.28.149.26 by merc94.us.sas.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 04 Jun 2000 22:18:48 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Received: from bb01f39.unx.sas.com by mozart (5.65c/SAS/Domains/5-6-90)
	id AA15940; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 22:18:47 -0400
Received: (from jwd@localhost)
	by bb01f39.unx.sas.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA20146;
	Sun, 4 Jun 2000 22:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from jwd)
From: "John W. DeBoskey" <jwd@unx.sas.com>
Message-Id: <200006050218.WAA20146@bb01f39.unx.sas.com>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/df df.1 df.c
In-Reply-To: <20000605012128.CFBE237B555@hub.freebsd.org> from "Jonathan M. Bresler"
 at "Jun 4, 2000 06:21:28 pm"
To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 22:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu,
	jwd@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 
> > > 
> > > That's called `BLOCKSIZE=1G df', thank you very much.
> > 
> > BZZZZT.  You could do df -k with `BLOCKSIZE=1K df' too but I don't see
> [snip]
> > FWIW, I didn't like the idea of another flag much either (we gonna add
> > -g to du(1) next?  It has a -k flag too) but I couldn't argue against
> > it from a POLA or consistency standpoint (there is -k AND there is
> 
> 	yes, seems if we are going to add -g to df, we should add it
> to du as well.  just one and not the other is confusing.   simarily we
> should add a -m to both df and du.  having -k and -g but not -m is
> very strange indeed.
> 
> jmb
> 

   df already has a -m flag. Please see rev 1.23 of df.c. I already
have patches for du to add the -m and -g flags.

-John



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message