From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 12 16:26:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77BC106566B for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EBA8FC0A for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5CGQ1p4012461; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:26:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m5CGQ1we012458; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:26:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:26:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Dick Hoogendijk In-Reply-To: <1213284810.879.7.camel@westmark> Message-ID: <20080612182533.O12433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1a5a68400806080604ped08ce8p120fc21107e7de81@mail.gmail.com> <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A61A193E@royal64.emp.zapto.org> <20080612132527.K5722@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1213284810.879.7.camel@westmark> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: RE: FreeBSD + ZFS on a production server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:26:50 -0000 >> pseudo-filesystem) if you want no protection, mirrored or raidz. > > Isn't it a pity that the fbsd implementation of ZFS lacks such a > feature. Your anti stories of ZFS often show these aspects. > Almost none of your comments on zfs are valid in Solaris. AFAIK on solaris set copies= and what i told before is the same. am i wrong?