From owner-cvs-all Sun Apr 7 11:55:12 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D783F37B41A for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 11:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g37It1F85231; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:55:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:55:01 +0200 From: Cejka Rudolf To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/colldef cs_CZ.ISO8859-2.src Message-ID: <20020407205501.A84706@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20020407170804.A79700@fit.vutbr.cz> <20020407181849.GA68881@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020407181849.GA68881@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:18:49PM +0400 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrey A. Chernov wrote (2002/04/07): > > No, you completely broke this table. Please, what does this mean? > > It is completely out of reasonable order now. Before, it was > > very close to our national collation norm and this norm is > > still mentioned at the beginning of the file - CSN 97 6030. > > If you could not believe in it, please look at collation table > > in Linux - they have this table similar. Why we could not have > > sorting in FreeBSD close to our norms? Why we have to have such > > broken sorting? Why you did not contact me before performing this > > change? > See README file commited to the colldef deirectory shortly and > la_LN.ISO8859-2.src table as good example. It seems that you are taking your new README as an axiom. Why you want that all collations have to be ASCII compatible? In which norm is it said? Previous collation sequence was not broken, so please use atleast forced commit and write down proper comment, why you have to break our collation. I saw both files, but please answer all my concrete questions with concrete and constructive respones. Maybe it is good example, but it is very broken for Czech and Slovak collation so we need our collation definition, which was correct and now is broken and I can not use sort anymore until I (and others) fix collation by hand. Please answer my questions and if there is something against another norms, I can consult it with other Czech and Slovak people on both sides, FreeBSD and Linux - but it is possible just based on some concrete and constructive reponse, why you are doing what you are doing. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message