Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 2 Oct 1997 23:32:11 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        dg@root.com, "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>, jkh@time.cdrom.com, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.971002233057.2359A-100000@586quick166.saturn-tech.com>
In-Reply-To: <199710021705.LAA02207@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Warner Losh wrote:

> *PLEASE*PLEASE*PLEASE* listen to Rod.  The kernels after 2.2.5-RELEASE
> should be called 2.2.5-STABLE.

Or we could always call it 2.2.x-STABLE, to indicate that it is the most
recent of the 2.2 branch (which is therefore, the 2.2.x branch...)  

??

Later......						<Doug>





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971002233057.2359A-100000>