From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 6 01:33:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0457416A4CE for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 01:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.jp.viruscheck.net (smtp3.jp.viruscheck.net [154.33.69.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE70843D1D for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 01:33:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from scan1.jp.viruscheck.net ([154.33.69.36] helo=mail3.jp.viruscheck.net) by smtp3.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BstbZ-0006fZ-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:33:09 +0900 Received: from [220.221.2.219] (helo=noc.orchid) by mail3.jp.viruscheck.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1BstbZ-00076O-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:33:09 +0900 Received: from [89.60.10.11] (horse.orchid [89.60.10.11]) by noc.orchid (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i761X86A080046; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:33:08 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4112DFD4.6050905@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:33:08 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040714 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gnome-system-monitor and libgtop2 2.7.90 don't work.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 01:33:14 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello, > > gnome-system-monitor and libgtop2 don't work, here's what I am getting: > > =================================== > % gnome-system-monitor > glibtop: read 4 bytes: Resource temporarily unavailable > pid 8712 received eof. > =================================== Imho that could mean only one thing libgtop2 <-> libgtop2_daemon socket get lost its non-blocking mode. I'll check it later. Btw do you still use libc_r? All the best, Alexander. > > Cheers, > Mezz > >