From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 13 14:48:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FE537B819; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:48:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA84693; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:48:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:48:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Justin Wolf , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Displacement of Blame[tm] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > (also note that I do think that the recent addition of the > word "Ports" to the subject line may be enough to address > these concerns) I think it's amusing that these concerns only came up *after* I made the change to try and address the very issue they now raise. How about the following: FreeBSD Security Advisory - SA-00:23.ip-options FreeBSD 3rd-party Ports Security Advisory - SA-00:29.wu-ftpd (i.e. drop the second FreeBSD and add '3rd-party' to ports to *further* disclaim responsibility. If you don't like it, suggest something better instead of just saying so :-) Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message