From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  9 09:15:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D66E16A4D0
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Jan 2004 09:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B652C43D82
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Jan 2004 09:15:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org)
Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim)
	id 1Af0DZ-0007bH-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:14:41 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:14:41 +0100
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Message-ID: <20040109171441.GV14031@poupinou.org>
References: <20040106153123.L27817@root.org>
	<20040107151531.161D73B90B@mail.if.lt> <20040108085952.7072E369A5@mail.if.lt>
	<20040108080739.L35340@root.org> <20040109131507.GT14031@poupinou.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040109131507.GT14031@poupinou.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ACPI panic
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:15:41 -0000

Answering to myself,

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:25:20AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Vaidas Damosevicius wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Nate Lawson wrote:

> The C0F0 is actually a inside the EC space handler, but you have
> to call _REG with the second argument (Arg1) as 1 when initiliazing
> the space handler before accessing C0F0.

Ok, Im stupid.  _REG is used only to inform firmware by ospm that the
space handler is enabled/disabled.

-- 
Ducrot Bruno

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.