From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 16:47:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A037B106564A for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7F58FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAADD3F8A51; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (tataz.chchile.org [82.233.239.98]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDCE3F768D; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [192.168.1.25]) by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE899BF12; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D997405B; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:32:22 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Antoine Brodin Message-ID: <20080418163222.GC4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20080418132749.GB4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Integration of ProPolice in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:47:32 -0000 Hi Antoine, On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:37:06PM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Last time I looked at your patch, there was a problem when using > -fstack-protector-all instead of -fstack-protector: > when you compile lib/csu/*, gnu/lib/csu/*, or > src/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c with this flag, there is a kind of > chicken/egg problem and you end up with an unusable world. > That said, it would be great to be able to compile world with SSP when > an option is set in src.conf. I'm kind of surprised by this statement. I will give it a shot this evening. I'll let you know. Thanks. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >