From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Oct 18 14:49:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39FDC178DE for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.xtaz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F19E124; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt.xtaz@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id q7so159630641qtq.1; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:49:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qcQbqEcVOo1ttStHRun22mLRBfkzyu6MCgvTagm7q7c=; b=OdcnsXrHTyq0r66a7awl9g5+3w74s09HtWpMZkkVPa+YQIuwNSlV/e61r7+UxndGY1 mH0z1t3bLFzviA5MUpvbCOY8D2lXpz0Mg7P9NYoBotxgktFLULwC4bh5jUQwOWFu0uEz A3L8ArAQyx5vjK4OYovuHXUoyn7eiuxMaRC5D+lDtqV7kFzmvxTw2EKLYXgKlu+V78+s u5259/b1Npm7vUZ9miudMkcr1BcbXcdv13e16hBXhmUUNqF5QXf0ZtaTEonM8TFOFNHr pplyoWEn/07jjSW9Xues6a/6Ii4LzecHMOXNQ2FttCPFvB4CYYl3/O/tCqyFtNuCrNfG qpUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qcQbqEcVOo1ttStHRun22mLRBfkzyu6MCgvTagm7q7c=; b=Lanm7zDcJp4CecxOkFqRvLAkF17cgkZVbLwSYJceiXH3WWUb8zc9bdD38Z8wO0CTPO QIhMLgonl5VSVyNn1NqxdOoRy9HhSrQfHykTmLyQ1IrRAouY2fMG11jZXgE/wE7OIKL7 mtczjd/yoVL/gIXj9n/GdPAHKOQlMVFpPMV5eTO9x7NyB+dc3P3fsRVMBE25X1LPj6yc auMuNELJzIhoOkGc+mcnRTwNFblsd583jkPdHxu2roHpCVFkMGFufglFXfUAYyh25az5 IVr03KYVH2DzR64Q6xSkfiUDXA5dbIgB5rNS3b7qGoJkcjphgqlN8TPXwPkGDfSihOCA jqsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkUNZfEDC+ODpLY92NPz7Ns+gA6OmjXVGjX+wDGJTDh835K4Iu6ri7/9P8ikWvPeQ== X-Received: by 10.28.95.213 with SMTP id t204mr12157388wmb.18.1476802140412; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk. [2001:8b0:fe33::10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm63501198wjs.11.2016.10.18.07.49.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:48:57 +0100 From: Matt Smith To: Valeri Galtsev Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: pw add user slow Message-ID: <20161018144857.GA14240@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Valeri Galtsev , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20161018074415.0f6575675db30d0b83d9b8ec@sohara.org> <60719.69.209.239.247.1476794773.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20161018140531.GA1080@lime.woodcruft.co.uk> <3ceed8a7-50dd-2fd5-d110-4a77e43f36ad@freebsd.org> <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32125.128.135.52.6.1476801176.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:49:01 -0000 On Oct 18 09:32, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >I have off topic question. Just the other day I got warning that dovecot >port currently has no maintainer. I was so happy with dovecot for over one >and a half decades, so switching to something else doesn't give me good >feelings. Anybody knows any more details about dovecot port? > >Thanks a lot for your answers! > >Valeri > The mail/dovecot port has no maintainer. The mail/dovecot2 port is well maintained and regularly updated. If you are still running dovecot 1.x then you should definitely look at upgrading to 2.x instead. The configuration file format changed significantly between the two though so it would be best to start fresh and work out what to port from the old to the new. -- Matt