From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 18 20:14:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD3B106572F; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EB98FC15; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phobos.local (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7IKCjuK078183; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:12:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4A8B0B3C.5060402@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:12:44 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <200908181355.n7IDtmqT019165@svn.freebsd.org> <4A8AC814.2070804@errno.com> <3bbf2fe10908181106u159934b9ofc4c2a5e4793b692@mail.gmail.com> <20090818183858.GB1794@garage.freebsd.pl> <4A8AF6C7.5010707@FreeBSD.org> <20090818200008.GC1794@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090818200008.GC1794@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Doug Barton , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Attilio Rao , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Sam Leffler Subject: Re: svn commit: r196358 - in head: share/man/man9 sys/kern sys/sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:14:22 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:45:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> >>> The only use I could think of was exactly what Sam suggested - a DDB >>> command and that was the only possible use I found. >>> >>> I decided to propose removal of this KPI, because nobody decided to use >>> it for more than 9 years now and this is a good thing to remove unused >>> code, no? >> Not during a freeze/right before a release, no. > > Then when? Between 8.3 and 8.4 when some 3rd party modules start to use it? > Was this code getting in the way of anything? Why are you so insistent to ignore advice like this? Please back this out. You don't unilateraly own all APIs that ZFS uses, and I saw no call for discussion on the taskqueue API. Scott