Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:18:15 -0700 From: Robert Clark <res03db2@gte.net> To: Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> Cc: "Aleksandar Simic'" <alex@frustum.clara.co.uk>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Dwalin <dwalin@haldjas.folklore.ee> Subject: Re: NEC IDE CD writer not working with burncd Message-ID: <20010405181815.B17686@darkstar.gte.net> In-Reply-To: <20010405162246.B1968@gforce.johnson.home>; from glennpj@charter.net on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:22:46PM -0500 References: <000201c0bd43$09ab65a0$1401a8c0@zoso> <Pine.BSF.3.96.1010405100506.49413A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> <20010405131142.A4466@frustum.clara.co.uk> <20010405162246.B1968@gforce.johnson.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I watched my brother go through this once. And decied then to stay away IDE burners. If the ide-scsi emulation has some magic in it that cdrecord does not, then it makes sense that cdrecord under FreeBSD might not work with as many drives. [RC] On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:22:46PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:11:43PM +0100, Aleksandar Simic' wrote: > > > Welcome to the club :) > > > > Some IDE CDR aren't supported because they use proprietary IDE > > additions. I've learned that the same, hard way as you. > > No one has been able to answer my question about this. Why is it that > these proprietary IDE additions that you refer to do not cause Linux to > trip? I know that Linux uses ide-scsi emulation and FreeBSD does not, > but shouldn't these proprietary IDE additions cause the ide-scsi module > loading to fail under Linux? > > -- > Glenn Johnson > glennpj@charter.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010405181815.B17686>