Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 09:19:21 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: bsd.ports.debug.mk Message-ID: <19971016091921.54649@klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Have currently a problem with pgcc-port. When patching manually everything is ok but not using ports collections auto patch mechanism ... I'd wish to have a bsd.ports.debug.mk, that's simply the same as bsd.ports.mk, but without hiding the commands, that are performed. So stripping all the '@' signs in front of the commands should do the trick. Would that be useful in general for all the other porters as well ?! One would have to change only the .include line in the Makefile to see what's actually happening instead of reading bsd.port.mk in parallel ?! Could/should we include such a version in -current and perhaps in -stable or is this too late or a idea, that's generally not wanted ? The only drawback I see is, that every change in bsd.port.mk would have to be included into bsd.port.debug.mk. Maybe one could create the debug version with a sed script, so that this work could be automated ?! Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' andreas@klemm.gtn.com - http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html andreas@FreeBSD.ORG - http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/benches.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971016091921.54649>